In a waste management facility, waste products are altered chemically, physically, and biologically for a variety of reasons. Scott Withiam does the same for the ordinary world around us in his latest collection (his third). Nothing ends up as it begins, resisting the usual predictions, long held notions, and plain logic. The result is an imaginative and singular adventure through a world we thought we knew.
The early pages of the book seem anchored enough in reality. The opening section focuses on the rustic landscape of a childhood spent “speeding across corn flats to the lake,” driving deer for hunters with a friend, and recalling the taste of a grandfather’s homemade pickles. But even the first poem, “Draft”, establishes the idea of an imbalance that is alluring and poses an important question. The speaker’s grandmother scales a wall at an overlook and leans into winds, imploring him to join her. “She kept telling me to step up, look, / but I covered my face,” he says, perhaps referring to the present danger or to some version of his own future in which, he too, will either be forced to let go, eschew sense, or continue to observe the world from a safe distance. Which, one wonders, would be preferable?
The question is perhaps answered in “Men’s Room” where a lone gas station attendant behind glass one night is a reminder of “unattended / animals . . . in a failed zoo, catatonic, / rubbing the same spot in a chain-link fence.” There are many ways to exist within the spectrum of balancing on the edge of violence to being stifled in a literal cage.
In “One Man Show” the speaker views paintings of familiar landscapes that capture grief, but he claims he is “not interested in any artist’s abstractions.” Rather, he longs to be grounded in the what is, to remain far from the ledge, perhaps the antithesis to poetry and certainly to many of the poems that follow. Here is how we manage, these first poems seem to say: Children navigate the fraught relationships of adults, adults reconcile painful aspects of their own pasts, all of us process grief.
Despite our attempts to tread carefully, it is impossible to ignore what threatens our peace, even when it happens offstage. In the poem “Hard Candy,” a young boy is admonished by an older person not to choke on a treat. While the warning is generic enough, actions outside the stuffy parlor where “three clocks ticking . . . / chased each other. One just had to take / the lead” is a scene that increasingly portends violence. Here and elsewhere, the poet bears witness to the small dramas of relationships and the larger social issues of migrant workers, failing farms, and boarded up factories, far from any abstract concepts of reality. If only we could exist in the world without internalizing its images, we wouldn’t need any alterations in what we find.
Instead, we embark on an experience that is anything but a preservation of realism. People strolling along a beach are “bugs on a jawbone . . . pill bugs topside and topsy-turvy.” When breakfast with an old friend becomes tense, one man imagines himself as a chief petty officer on the eighteenth century New England streets full of “coopers, cordwainers, and shipwrights.” Another poem’s speaker imagines a discussion between the lovers where the woman becomes “as tight-lipped as a mollusk” and the man wonders, “And what did that make me? A greasy dumpster raccoon / feeling around for a clam underwater.”
The heart of the book centers around lessons learned from the speaker’s job at a waste treatment plant: look busy, keep out of trouble, and observe the world through a clear lens that often relies on humor and the ability to manipulate language—the perfect internship for a young poet:
As for feeling bad about being paid to
or about being removed from view
or about cheating taxpayers
or wrestling with the value
of a hard day's work or complicity,
I’m sorry, none of those concerns surfaced.
The young man’s candor and his acceptance of his role matures into a realization that what keeps people most busy is avoiding solutions. Kids convince themselves they can’t learn algebra. Teachers can’t control the chaos in the cafeteria. Scientists can’t determine what has killed the birds they study. No one can slice a block of cheese with the proffered knife. When a former chemist flees his own country and ends up cleaning professors’ offices, his supervisor reminds him not to finish his day too early: “‘We don’t want to get ahead of ourselves. Then what would there be?’” The void, of course. Time to confront real questions. No wonder we spend so much of our lives engaged in the meaningless and make so little progress. The only employee who demonstrates any initiative in these poems is a blue jay (yes, the bird) who, fired from his job at a funeral home because he made a nest in the hair of the deceased, earns a new position as a concierge because the manager can’t imagine “who better to direct visitors to the most interesting places.” In Withiam’s world, this scenario is less ridiculous than reality.
In these pages it is the non-poets who reach for creative expression—a brochure writer, the colleague trying to describe his golf swing, the woman who “had called curtains / of squalls giant jellyfishes, when a child / living on a high plateau.” By contrast, in “The Angry Estate Gardener,” the eulogists at a friend’s memorial service who are poets, lose their craft when they most need it. The speaker listens to their maddening chorus of platitudes. Meanwhile, he remembers the story his late friend told of the time he worked with a gardener who raised koi and banana trees to sell to the rich. The only marvel to a man wealthy enough to rent the trees for a party, is that they can stand on their own despite such shallow roots. “No one can stand on their own,” the friend offers, “covering, all at once, a lot of territory— from gardener to the great idea of global share so far from carried out, to poets—and right there was let go on the spot.”
Withiam isn’t subject to treacle and sentimentality. He’s disgruntled, sarcastic, impatient with ornamentation. He’s very much part of the “real” world. (He reads People Magazine in doctors’ offices, pauses on his way to teach a class, surprised to hear an admissions tour guide using the fact that the school has Aaron Hernadez’s brain. “But where’s the heart?” he wonders?) But he is also capable of producing poems in which suitcases are interviewed by detectives, and a hibiscus, hybridized beyond all fragrance, dreams of hatching a mockingbird to once again distinguish itself. One of the final poems begins with a couple’s first promising night together and then veers into a dream world where manholes speak to the woman trying to escape her new lover, in part because he corrects her vocabulary.
Even the sacred art of poetry itself can be reexamined through Withiam’s lens. In an attempt to win a poetry contest to make his mother proud before she dies, he is only partially successful. He wins, but is accompanied to the reception by his mother’s ghost who assures him “‘that poetry can transport anyone great distances.’” Instead of finding this inspiring, he is unable to write. Instead, he takes a job dressed as the Statue of Liberty, standing on a street corner and waving motorists into the parking lot of a tax preparation office. Solutions ahead!
In Waste Management Facility, Scott Withiam asks his readers what the grandmother in the first poem asked: Will you stand here on this ledge? As the wind howls and blows your coattails like sails, will you forego your safety net? Are you prepared to see what happens when, uncaged, unbound by logic, you, instead, trust in a balancing act between what is and what can be? The answer, of course, especially where these poems are concerned, is yes.